Fact-Checking Policy
J Randall Powers Interior Decoration commits to publishing accurate and reliable information. Our goal is to provide trustworthy content that helps readers understand interior design, decoration, and related topics. This policy details the steps we take to ensure the factual integrity of our articles before publication.
Our Verification Process
Each piece of content undergoes a thorough review process before it goes live. Editors and writers check all statements, figures, historical details, and material specifications. We confirm the accuracy of design principles, historical periods, and practical advice shared on our site.
Prioritizing Reliable Sources
We prioritize specific types of sources to ensure the highest level of accuracy. These sources offer credible, substantiated information.
- Primary Sources: We seek original research, historical documents, design archives, direct interviews with designers or artisans, and photographs or plans from the period discussed. These provide direct evidence and first-hand accounts.
- Peer-Reviewed Sources: Academic journals and scholarly articles on design history, architecture, material science, or art history offer validated information. These sources have been vetted by experts in their fields.
- Official Sources: Manufacturer specifications for furnishings and materials, government building codes, industry association reports, and reputable museum collections provide authoritative data. This ensures we present correct product details and safety information.
Evaluating Claims
When assessing any claim, we look for supporting evidence from at least two independent, reliable sources where possible. We analyze the context of the information and consider potential biases of the source. Claims about specific design styles, material durability, or historical origins must have strong backing.
Handling Unverifiable Claims
If a claim cannot be verified through our established source priorities, we will not publish it as fact. We may present such information as a theory, an anecdotal observation, or a clearly attributed opinion if relevant to the content. Transparency guides our approach when facts are uncertain.
Distinguishing Fact from Opinion
We clearly separate objective facts from subjective opinions within our content. Facts, such as the composition of a textile or the architectural period of a building, are presented with verifiable evidence. Opinions, like a personal preference for a particular color scheme or decor trend, are attributed to the author or a quoted expert.
Our articles may offer style advice or personal recommendations. We always aim to clarify when these are subjective interpretations rather than universally accepted truths.
Reporting Errors and Requesting Corrections
We welcome our readers to help maintain the accuracy of our content. If you identify an error or believe information is incorrect, please contact us immediately. We take all correction requests seriously and investigate them promptly.
To report an error, send an email to [email protected]. Please include the article title, the URL, and a clear description of the alleged inaccuracy. Provide links to reliable sources that support your claim if possible. Our editorial team will review your report and make necessary corrections within 48 hours on business days if an error is confirmed.
This policy was last updated in March 2026.
